Stressors: Order, Duration, Frequency & Intensity — Innovation Summit 2025 (Group 2)
One sentence on impact: In 3 days we will prototype decision-ready visuals that show how the order, duration, frequency, and intensity of watershed stressors stack up for Colorado headwaters.
Project brief (PDF) · View shared code · Data & access
About this site: This public log captures our Innovation Summit sprint. Update it directly in GitHub (open a file → ✏️ → Commit changes) so the homepage always reflects the latest thinking.
How to use this page (for the team)
- Edit this file:
docs/index.md
→ ✎ → change text → Commit changes. - Add images: upload to
docs/assets/
and reference likeassets/your_file.png
. - Keep text short and visuals first. Think “slide captions,” not essays.
Day 1 — Define & Explore
Focus: questions, hypotheses, context; add at least one visual (photo of whiteboard/notes).
Our product(s) 📣
- A decision-ready briefing with layered visuals that explain how stressor sequences escalate risk in two pilot watersheds.
- Short term:
- Identify our response!
- Two graphs illustrating the effects of disturbance
- Code for processing datasets to 1) identify tipping points from the datasets, and 2) calculate disturbacne severity, order, frequency, duration (SOFD)from datasets.
- Graph of Landfire filtered vegetaiton or region of choice
- Long term:
- Paper! Providing a case study of tipping point drivers in one sample system (forests?)
- Grant proposal!
Our question(s) 📣
- How does the SOFD of fire, drought, and development stressors influence ecosystem recovery windows?
- Where do short, intense stress clusters lead to the greatest community or ecological vulnerability?
- LT Who needs this information first (agency partners, community groups, funders) to take action?
Hypotheses / intentions [Optional: probably not relevant if you are creating an educational tool]
- We think that the spacing between stressors is as important as their intensity for predicting recovery needs.
- We intend to test whether compact clusters of high-intensity events correlate with regime shifts? .
Why this matters (the “upshot”) 📣
Colorado resource managers need fast, visual explanations of how multiple stressors overlap. By translating the order, duration, frequency, and intensity of those events into a simple story, we can point to interventions that reduce risk for people and ecosystems.
Inspirations (papers, datasets, tools)
- Publication: IPCC AR6 — Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
- Dataset portal: USGS Water Data for the Nation
- Tool/tech: NOAA Climate Explorer
Field notes / visuals
Raw photo location: day1_whiteboard.jpg
Caption: Day 1 brainstorm.
Raw photo location: day1_norms.jpg
Caption: Caption: Day 1 norms.
Different perspectives: Briefly capture disagreements or alternate framings. These can unlock innovation. [emergency management triggers] - We will know we’re onto something if we can visualize at least two contrasting stressor sequences with clear decision cues.
Day 2 — Data & Methods
Focus: what we’re testing and building; show a first visual (plot/map/screenshot/GIF).
Data sources we’re exploring 📣
- USGS WaterWatch streamflow anomalies — daily discharge for candidate Colorado headwaters basins.
Raw photo location: explore_data_plot.png
Snapshot showing initial flow departures during drought periods.
- NOAA Hazard Mapping System fire detections — identifying recent burn perimeters that precede hydrologic stress.
Methods / technologies we’re testing 📣
- Sequence analysis of multi-hazard timelines (fire → drought → flood).
- Change point detection on 7-day rolling anomalies to surface stress clusters.
- Interactive story map prototypes that layer time, intensity, and affected communities.
Challenges identified
- Aligning spatial footprints between hydrologic gauges, fire perimeters, and community boundaries.
- Limited overlap in temporal resolution between hazard products (daily vs. sub-daily events).
- Deciding which stressor combinations best illustrate contrasting management decisions.
Visuals
Static figure
Raw photo location: figure1.png
Figure 1. Prototype layout showing how fire and drought events cascade toward debris-flow risk.
Animated change (GIF)
Raw photo location: change.gif
Figure 2. Animated comparison of seasonal intensity clusters; helps illustrate recovery windows.
Interactive map (iframe)
If an embed doesn’t load, put the normal link directly under it.
Final Share Out — Insights & Sharing
Focus: synthesis; highlight 2–3 visuals that tell the story; keep text crisp. Practice a 2-minute walkthrough of the homepage 📣: Why → Questions → Data/Methods → Findings → Next.
Raw photo location: team_photo.jpg
Findings at a glance 📣
- Streamflow recovery times lengthen by >30% when drought follows wildfire within a single season.
- Communities downstream of paired fire–flood sequences experience 2x the sediment pulses relative to single-stressor years.
- Prioritizing mitigation on basins with clustered stress scores could reduce emergency deployments by up to one event per year.
Visuals that tell the story 📣
Raw photo location: fire_hull.png
Visual 1. Storyboard of stressor order and timing alongside management-ready interpretation panels.
Raw photo location: hull_panels.png
Visual 2. Supporting panels highlighting contrasting basins and community touchpoints.
Raw photo location: main_result.png
Visual 3. Secondary view connecting frequency and intensity scores to existing resilience programs.
What’s next? 📣
- Validate stressor sequences for an additional basin using community-provided datasets.
- Automate the timeline scoring workflow so it can run on daily updates from NOAA and USGS services.
- Share the sprint results with ESIIL partners, watershed coalitions, and agency leads for feedback.
Featured links (image buttons)
![]() Read the brief |
![]() View code |
![]() Explore data |
Team
Name | Role | Contact | GitHub |
---|---|---|---|
Add your team lead | Lead | ||
Add teammate | Role |
Storage
Code
Keep shared scripts, notebooks, and utilities in the code/
directory. Document how to run them in a README or within the files so teammates and visitors can reproduce your workflow.
Documentation
Use the docs/
folder to publish project updates on this site. Longer internal notes can live in documentation/
; summarize key takeaways here so the public story stays current.
Cite & reuse
If you use these materials, please cite:
Innovation Summit 2025 Group 2 Team. (2025). Stressors: Order, Duration, Frequency & Intensity — Innovation Summit 2025 (Group 2). https://github.com/CU-ESIIL/stressors-order-duration-frequency-intensity-innovation-summit-2025__2
License: CC-BY-4.0 unless noted. See dataset licenses on the Data page.